Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Ahead of the 2025 elections: Pressure and sabotage threaten the CNE

CNE at risk

In the period approaching the November 2025 general elections, numerous political, social, and legal figures in Honduras have reported a collection of pressures and intimidation acts aimed at the National Electoral Council (CNE). These allegations primarily concern the governing party, Libertad y Refundación (LIBRE), which is accused of trying to sway the CNE’s decisions and endanger the electoral process’s transparency.

Allegations about the LIBRE party

The accusations directed at the governing party involve efforts to undermine the legitimacy of the CNE, the organization accountable for guaranteeing the impartiality and transparency of the elections. As per the accusations, LIBRE members are organizing initiatives to exert pressure on CNE judges, particularly those who are not aligned with their political agenda, thus impacting the institution’s independence.

Maribel Espinoza, quien es legisladora y analista política, mencionó que el objetivo de esta presión es generar un ambiente de desconfianza que pueda dar fundamento a acusaciones de fraude o desorganización electoral. “Están presionando al árbitro electoral porque saben que las encuestas no los favorecen,” afirmó Espinoza, haciendo una clara alusión a los intentos de ciertos sectores de incidir en los resultados electorales antes de que las campañas inicien.

Institutional sabotage tactics

The allegations are not limited to pressure on magistrates, but also include the spread of hostile rhetoric by figures close to the LIBRE party. A growing disinformation campaign has been identified on social media, aimed at undermining the credibility of the CNE and sowing doubts about the impartiality of the electoral body.

Civil society organizations concerned about the integrity of the electoral process have pointed to these acts as possible attempts at institutional sabotage. They assert that such maneuvers are not only an attack on the legitimacy of the CNE, but also constitute a danger to the democratic order of the country, exacerbating political polarization ahead of the November 2025 elections.

Requests for global oversight

In view of the worsening situation, various sectors of society have called for the intervention of international observers to safeguard the transparency of the electoral process. In this regard, organizations such as the Organization of American States (OAS), the European Union, and various human rights entities have been asked to monitor the conduct of the elections, ensuring that the process is carried out without political interference or manipulation.

Lidia Meza, an expert in constitutional law, emphasized the necessity of preserving the electoral system’s autonomy, pointing out that “the electoral system must remain free from partisan control. The nation requires assurances, not intimidation.”

Context and challenges for democracy

Reports of threats and efforts to undermine institutions contribute to an image of increasing political division in Honduras, where distrust of institutions and electoral processes has been intensified by several factors, including the economic crisis and absence of political unity. This atmosphere, characterized by tensions and reciprocal accusations, presents significant difficulties for the country’s administration, with less than a year remaining before the elections.

The international community is closely monitoring the process, while Honduran citizens continue to demand greater transparency and the preservation of democratic institutions. The current situation highlights the difficulties in guaranteeing an electoral environment free from pressure and manipulation, and underscores the need to strengthen the institutions responsible for ensuring the exercise of democracy.

By Winston Phell

You May Also Like