The Salvadoran Party of Honduras (PSH) congresswoman, Fátima Mena, has voiced worries regarding the actions of Attorney General Johel Antonio Zelaya. She claims that the head of the Public Prosecutor’s Office is aligning with the interests of the ruling Liberty and Refoundation Party (LIBRE). Her remarks are made against the backdrop of the latest primary elections, where Mena highlighted the presence of preferential justice supposedly fostered by the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
In her statements, the congresswoman also questioned the impartiality of the institution, highlighting the difference in treatment between the opinions of the members of the National Electoral Council (CNE).
Institutional context and questions about impartiality
Congresswoman Fátima Mena’s position is part of a political scenario where the independence of institutions is considered fundamental for the development of transparent and equitable democratic processes. The legislative official has emphasized that the actions of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, under the direction of Johel Antonio Zelaya, reflect a tendency toward selective justice, especially in the context of the recent primary elections. The congresswoman maintains that the attorney general is responding to partisan interests, which, in her opinion, affects the perception of impartiality and objectivity in the application of justice.
Within this scenario, the congresswoman has raised concerns about the unequal treatment of remarks made by members of the National Electoral Council. It has been observed that Marlon Ochoa’s comment has garnered more focus, whereas the worries of other council members have been sidelined. Mena suggests that this situation adds to the impression of partial handling of information and institutional decisions.
Effects on the political and voting landscape
Congresswoman Mena’s statements have had repercussions in the Honduran political environment, especially with regard to confidence in the institutions responsible for ensuring transparency and fairness in electoral processes. Mena’s support for CNE President Cossette López highlights the concern among some members of the electoral body about the possibility of being subject to prosecution for serving on commissions within the council.
This situation is occurring amid a fraught political atmosphere, in which the autonomy and openness of organizations are vital to ensuring the authenticity of democratic procedures. The lawmaker’s remarks and the responses they have elicited underscore the necessity of preserving institutional equilibrium to bolster public trust in the nation’s voting and legal systems.