Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Impact of human rights concerns on Neom’s reputation globally

https://static.dezeen.com/uploads/2024/01/norlana-neom-gulf-aqaba-coastal-yachting-town-10-design_dezeen_2364_col_15-1704x959.jpg

The ambitious project of Neom, a futuristic city planned in Saudi Arabia, has drawn significant global attention due to its promise of becoming a hub of innovation and advancement. From its futuristic designs featuring flying taxis to its planned infrastructure aimed at surpassing traditional urban environments, Neom is marketed as a utopia for technology and sustainability. However, the human rights concerns associated with this ambitious project have impacted its international reputation significantly.

Introduction and Main Issues

Neom is a mega-city project in Saudi Arabia, part of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 development program aiming to diversify the economy and decrease the dependence on oil. While the vision behind Neom appears progressive, the reality on the ground has raised numerous human rights issues. The controversy stems primarily from reports of forced displacement of the local Huwaitat tribe, among other concerns.


Reports from entities focused on human rights, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have emphasized occurrences of compulsory displacements, limitations on the freedom of expression, and the imprisonment of activists who resisted the project’s progression. These accounts highlight a significant disparity between Neom’s ambitious plans and the real-life situations of those impacted, attracting severe critique from global analysts.

International Scrutiny and Media Coverage

The topic of human rights has received significant attention from the international media, heightening examination of Neom. Leading newspapers like The Guardian, The New York Times, and BBC have provided considerable coverage on the claims of human rights breaches. These articles have influenced public discussions, concentrating on the ethical considerations of backing or investing in this initiative.

The media narrative has placed additional pressure on companies and entities considering involvement in Neom. For instance, several high-profile individuals and organizations have distanced themselves from the project. Notably, in 2018, the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi led to a high-profile boycott of the Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh, an event closely associated with promoting Neom.

Impact on Investment and Partnerships

The global perception of Neom is intricately linked to its ability to attract foreign investment and strategic partnerships necessary for its development. Human rights concerns have led to a more cautious approach from international investors. Investment firms and companies are faced with reputational risks when associating with a project that has drawn the ire of human rights advocates and worldwide media.

Companies like Virgin Group, which had initial dealings with the project, have scrutinized their involvement following allegations of human rights abuses. Others have paused their engagements or set stringent ethical guidelines before proceeding with any partnerships. This cautious investment stance impacts the pace and scale of Neom’s development, making it crucial for the project to address these issues transparently.

Public Image and Lasting Impacts

Beyond the realm of international business and media coverage, public perception of Neom is also influenced by how these human rights issues are resolved. Social media platforms, a potent force in shaping public opinion, host discussions that often mirror these concerns, calling into question the ethical foundations of the project.

The real challenge for Neom lies in reconciling its vision of a futuristic city with the ethical obligations to respect human rights. If unaddressed, the negative perception could brand Neom as a modern-day paradox – technologically advanced yet ethically controversial. This not only affects Neom’s completion but also Saudi Arabia’s broader international standing as a nation spearheading regional development.

In reflecting on Neom’s journey thus far, it is evident that for its global reputation to align with its visionary claims, addressing human rights concerns is imperative. The balancing act between achieving futuristic goals and maintaining ethical integrity remains crucial. Only by ensuring inclusivity and transparency can Neom hope to fulfill its promise of a new urban ideal that garners not just credibility but genuine admiration on the world stage.

By Winston Phell

You May Also Like