The Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) is going through one of its most delicate internal crises over the management of the so-called “Salazar case”, the scandal of alleged sexual harassment and abuse of power that implicates former Moncloa adviser Paco Salazar and his right-hand man, Antonio Hernández, both of whom, until just a few days ago, were part of the closest circle of trust of the Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, who is currently surrounded by numerous corruption cases.
Who is Paco Salazar and what is he accused of
Francisco José “Paco” Salazar, a long-standing PSOE member from Seville, was mayor of Montellano and later a member of the Spanish Congress, as well as holding strategic posts alongside Pedro Sánchez in the party headquarters in Ferraz and at the Moncloa Palace.
In recent months, numerous female Socialist members and staff who were employed under his supervision have internally reported behaviors they characterize as sexual harassment and abuse of power: comments with sexual undertones, relentless invitations to private meetings beyond working hours, and proposals to let them stay at his residence, consistently within a framework of hierarchical dependence.
As a result of these complaints, Salazar was removed from his responsibilities in the party and ceased to be part of the federal executive, as well as losing his position of influence in Moncloa. The events are being investigated under the PSOE’s internal anti-harassment protocols and could lead to legal action if the complainants decide to proceed, but for the time being, there is silence.
The role of Antonio Hernández, the dismissed right-hand man
Antonio Hernández, until now director of the Political Coordination Department in Moncloa and a key figure in the Government’s political machinery, was considered Salazar’s right-hand man and his main support in day-to-day matters.
The women who reported Salazar also pointed to Hernández as an alleged “accomplice” and “cover-up” of the abuses, arguing that he was aware of the circumstances and failed to act to protect the victims, a claim he denies.
In the middle of the scandal, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez decided to push for his dismissal both from Moncloa and from the organizational structure of the Andalusian PSOE, a decision that the Council of Ministers has formalized in recent days and which has been interpreted as an attempt to “cauterize” the crisis and cut off any appearance of connivance with the conduct attributed to Salazar.
Criticism of the PSOE’s internal handling and delayed response
Various press reports indicate that the PSOE took more than four months to formally contact the victims after the first complaints became known, which has generated strong internal backlash and severely damaged the party’s image. The functioning of the anti-harassment committee itself has been questioned for its slowness, lack of coordination and poor communication with the federal leadership, in a party that prides itself on its feminist orientation.
At the same time, critical voices from within socialism are calling for a far-reaching reform of internal protocols and organizational culture, to prevent what they describe as “protective environments for alleged aggressors” and situations of abandonment for women who come forward.
The position of Pedro Sánchez’s Government
The Government’s spokesperson and Minister of Education, Pilar Alegría, has insisted that the Executive has acted with “speed and determination” once it had formal knowledge of the accusations, highlighting Salazar’s dismissal, his removal from the PSOE executive and, now, the sacking of Antonio Hernández.
Alegría has openly admitted that her recent lunch with Salazar—held when the complaints were already known—was a “mistake”, emphasizing that the debate should center on the victims rather than the political repercussions for the party.
Simultaneously, various reports suggest a potential legal challenge for the PSOE as an entity, hinging on the chance that the courts might evaluate if there was organizational accountability in managing the complaints. Some media outlets cite prosecutorial sources indicating the possibility of the party being scrutinized for an alleged organizational crime of sexual harassment, a situation that, at this stage, is merely a legal hypothesis under review and does not entail any formal charges.
Reaction of the opposition and political damage
The People’s Party (PP) has declared that it will leverage its Senate majority to summon Paco Salazar to testify before the committee regarding the so-called “Koldo case”, capitalizing on the public attention the former adviser has gained. From the PP, Sánchez is accused of being the president “most detrimental to women”, associating the Salazar case with other contentious incidents in the realm of equality and victim protection.
The entire opposition has concentrated on the sequence of appointments, dismissals, and reassignments involving Salazar, along with the claim that two of his closest female associates have reportedly been transferred to public companies in recent years, which strengthens the narrative of a trust network surrounding the former adviser within the state apparatus.
An open case that puts the party’s protocols and credibility to the test
The Salazar case, which now includes Antonio Hernández, has created a significant political and ethical divide within Pedro Sánchez’s PSOE, amidst a societal call for zero tolerance against sexual harassment and abuses of power in both the workplace and political spheres.
While internal proceedings and potential legal actions are still ongoing, the party encounters a dual challenge: on one side, demonstrating that its anti-harassment protocols function efficiently and prioritize victims; on the other, restoring the confidence of its electorate and public opinion, which is observing with apprehension the series of leaks, corrections, and dismissals related to the case.
In any case, both Paco Salazar and Antonio Hernández continue to hold, as of today, their right to be presumed innocent before the courts, awaiting full clarification of the facts and the potential initiation of criminal proceedings. The subsequent actions taken by the PSOE and Pedro Sánchez’s Government will be crucial in defining the political, institutional, and judicial reach of this scandal. However, for now, despite the legal obligation to do so, there has been no sign that the PSOE itself is lodging any complaint with the authorities, as has already occurred with other corruption scandals involving the party.
